Sunday, April 27, 2014

Meditation Defined by Krishnamurti (And Prose on the Soulful Genius of Children)

I ride my unicycle as a form of meditation, feels the young girl. She feels it rather than says it because the genius of youth is its intuition. It need not be able to articulate wisdom in order to understand it. I sometimes play my handheld video game while I ride. My soul watches the road from inside my chest, inside my finite heart. She turns up the corners of her mouth in ecstasy. I know a secret right now, one that's only digestible in the present moment, like an untellable joke for the ages. Her meditation gets lambasted by adults as unproductive, solitary, weird, sometimes rascally. Child's play that will wear off its luster come maturity. I ride my unicycle as a form of meditation, she repeats from her heart, shooting her message into the hearts of others like laser beams. Join me if you're brave enough, courageous enough to live outside of time, outside of language, to be conscious forever in the singular peace of the moment.

She will one day develop amnesia about her youthful epiphanies, her former genius. She will don a cap and gown. Then a suit. She will judge others on their surfaces and forget that she has a deeper self. She will envelop herself in a mobile metal box that stands for her temporary opinion on all that's proper. But one day wisdom will all come rushing back. It will hit her in the heart. She will come to see meditation as a practice implemented with crossed legs and deep breaths, and she will forget that all she needs is a unicycle, an empty mind, and an open heart. Whatever gets me back here, she will say. And she will give fond looks to unicyclists everywhere, unsure as to why.



There are a few ways you can be a hero and support AJ. Free things are: try Audible or AmazonPrime for 30 days, link us to a social network like TwitterFacebook or Reddit, or download and rate the podcast in iTunesIf you have a little spare money you can send a Paypal donation to ajsnookauthor@gmail.com, buy one of AJ's Kindle eBooks, or buy anything on Amazon by going through the Amazon links on the site. Thanks so much for your support, AJ

Tuesday, April 22, 2014

Plotting Life in Graphs: The Eight Wavering Conditions

Gain/loss; status/disgrace, censure/praise, pleasure/pain: these eight conditions arise in some form pretty much daily. And they are subject to change.

http://www.amazon.com/mn/search/?_encoding=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&field-keywords=buddha&linkCode=ur2&sprefix=budd%2Caps%2C221&tag=thajsnbl-20&url=search-alias%3DapsThanks to Reddit's r/buddhism for this one. I find that thinking mathematically by plotting these eight experiences and emotions below along the temporal graph that is each day is a helpful way to squelch the ego, to boost creativity and compassion, and to be myself and in the moment more frequently. Visualizing change as waves, troughs, peaks or valleys is a remarkable method of reflection and self-optimization.

Calculation is not always cold. Wise living doesn't always live in the stanzas of verse or in the subtle suggestions of prose. Measurements are important too. Economics is not only the study of money, but that of trends and of systems. What is the state of my self's economy? Can I represent it outside of emotional response?

I imagine a Buddha out there somewhere -- maybe on a mountaintop or maybe behind a desk -- who is so in-tune with these eight categories that they begin to melt away, to fade into the routine of aware experience.

And so the poem goes:

Gain/loss,
status/disgrace,
censure/praise,
pleasure/pain:
these conditions among human beings
are inconstant,
impermanent,
subject to change.

Knowing this, the wise person, mindful,
ponders these changing conditions.
Desirable things    don't charm the mind,
undesirable ones    bring no resistance.

His welcoming
& rebelling are scattered,
gone to their end,
do not exist.
Knowing the dustless, sorrowless state,
he discerns rightly,
has gone, beyond becoming,
to the Further Shore.

There are a few ways you can be a hero and support AJ. Free things are: try Audible or AmazonPrime for 30 days, link us to a social network like TwitterFacebook or Reddit, or download and rate the podcast in iTunesIf you have a little spare money you can send a Paypal donation to ajsnookauthor@gmail.com, buy one of AJ's Kindle eBooks, or buy anything on Amazon by going through the Amazon links on the site. Thanks so much for your support, AJ

Thursday, April 17, 2014

Don’t Be Passive: Stephen King Gives Advice

I almost titled this post in the passive tense, so thankfully I’m learning from Stephen King already. Not that this is new information by any means as I have a recurring waking nightmare of my elementary school teachers warning me about passive voice as they called it. Perhaps fear is a good motivator in this case.

King writes in his fantastic book about our craft, On Writing, “I think timid writers like passive verbs for the same reason time lovers like passive partners. The passive voice is safe.”

Safe is a polite way to put it. Cowardly is another. I argue that writers who align with the passive voice are generally afraid of getting close to their characters and the worlds they inhabit. These writers see themselves as outsiders or lurkers of these words, and they don’t give their creations the respect that they deserve, the perception in the mind of the reader that they are tangible and real, that their faces are pressed up against you, breathing on you, inviting you into to their rising action, climax, and denouement.

King continues:

"I won’t say there’s no place for the passive tense. Suppose, for instance, a fellow died in the kitchen but ends up somewhere else. The body was carried from the kitchen and placed on the parlor sofa is a fair way to put this, although “was carried” and “was placed” still irk the shit out of me. I accept them but I don’t embrace them. What I would embrace is Freddy and Myra carried the body out of the kitchen and laid in on the parlor sofa. Why does the body have to be the subject of the sentence, anyway? It’s dead, for Christ’s sake! Fugeddaboudit!


Two pages of the passive voice – just about any business document ever written, in other words, not to mention reams of bad fiction – make me want to scream. It’s weak, it’s circuitous, and it’s frequently tortuous, as well. How about his: My first kiss will always be recalled by me as how my romance with Shayna was begun. Oh, man – who farted, right? A simpler way to express this idea – sweeter and more forceful, as well – might be this: My romance with Shayna began with our first kiss. I’ll never forget it. I’m not in love with this because it uses with twice in four words, but at least we’re out of that awful passive voice."

With these simple and active revisions my mind sees the characters more crisply and I am more open to the possibility that they each have unique quirks and subtleties, just like you and me. How does either active or passive voice affect you as a reader? Is it intimidating to rub shoulders with your characters when you write your verbs actively? Too intense? Or is that the kind of punk rock prose that you live for?


There are a few ways you can be a hero and support AJ. Free things are: try Audible or AmazonPrime for 30 days, link us to a social network like TwitterFacebook or Reddit, or download and rate the podcast in iTunesIf you have a little spare money you can send a Paypal donation to ajsnookauthor@gmail.com, buy one of AJ's Kindle eBooks, or buy anything on Amazon by going through the Amazon links on the site. Thanks so much for your support, AJ

Monday, April 14, 2014

The Tao of Fishing (Poetic Prose)

Riverside sitting, the kind that summons the blood sun and sets aside the urge for instant gratification, is just one activity (calling it such puts a burning stretch on the definition of that very word) that brings Stu, like a child, close to the heart of all things. A school teacher by trade, his life affords him 14 weeks a year devoid of responsibilities apart from the exuding of compassion toward his fellow man...and taxes. He fishes to remind himself that he is of nature, that he is nature. He is an assortment of atoms and an illusion of empty space, arranged in a way that has allowed the alias Stu to come to be.

taoism, lao tzu, fishing, tao of fishingPatience is his beacon, and though not always pointing to true north, he's often aimed in its vicinity. Whether nine fish or none, Stu remains. His trusty blue denim hat, bleached by the sun's tendrils and frayed by the wind's whip, is closer to compost than to top-shelf and has seen better days. He waits out the sun and the flies and the false nibbles -- grasses, pebbles, and the probing turtle that hasn't made the menu.

Sitting by this river has taught him to smile at an empty stomach and a cold damp drizzle, as well as at a fat fried fish and the late May breeze. Companionship he occasionally finds in a colleague or a friend from out of town. Loneliness tells him as much about nature as the shapes of rocks and the changing hues of the sky on high. An empty moment is nothing more than companionship out of time.

He is turmoil. He is peace. He is nature.

Simplicity, patience, compassion.
These three are your greatest treasures.
Simple in actions and thoughts, you return to the source of being.
Patient with both friends and enemies,
you accord with the way things are.
Compassionate toward yourself,
you reconcile all beings in the world.

Lao Tzu


Sunday, April 13, 2014

Sage Ritskan Flash Fiction Series: Meet the Principal

"You know, it's funny you should ask, because my old school really was just like the Wild West."

"Saloons and floosies?" asked Mr. Peters. Mr. Peters had already put in his leave notice (off to the smoggy port appendage of Beijing known as Tianjin in the fall) so he was relishing the opportunity to be crass (borderline subordinate) with the new head honcho (wagering his daily peace for the chance to, for once in a rare while, push the new chief's buttons, pleasurably) on his way out the revolving door knows as Sage Ritskan School.
dark, short stories, series, school
"Pretty much. Well...the saloons anyway," replied the new principal, Mr. Schlagenfucher.

"Allegedly, there are floosies to be found around here, as well as saloons," said an increasingly bold Mr. Peters. "Not that I would know."

Like a disinterested toddler in front of a butterless, saltless bowl of greens, Mr. Schlagenfucher disengaged this bout of infantilism and flipped his switch to silent stoicism, absent of ego, a calm breeze gusting from within, whistling through his peach-fuzzy ears like they were mystic kazoos. 

Just a week before his flight to the new school his aunt, the woman who raised him alongside her own flesh and blood, devoid of descrimination, pure with hot white intent, had passed away suddenly. A bridge accident was all he was told. Fond of both the card game and the engineered variety, Mr. Schlagenfucher thought it best not to inquire as to which variety of bridge did the poor old lady in, for it comforted him to believe that a doozy of the first variety was the experience to end her.

There are a few ways you can be a hero and support AJ. Free things are: try Audible or AmazonPrime for 30 days, link us to a social network like TwitterFacebook or Reddit, or download and rate the podcast in iTunesIf you have a little spare money you can send a Paypal donation to ajsnookauthor@gmail.com, buy one of AJ's Kindle eBooks, or buy anything on Amazon by going through the Amazon links on the site. Thanks so much for your support, AJ

Saturday, April 12, 2014

Sage Ritskan School: Flash Fiction Intro

dark, short stories, series, school
I haven't been flexing it lately. That muscle, that nebulous cluster of neurons that gets bored and scatters when under used, I let it atrophy. If ego drives creation, then another kind of ego steers consumption's wheel, and he's a real motherfucker.

We are afraid to talk about the mysticism behind creativity; our sanitized, materialist mode of perception has no room for it in its pie chart model. If the shaman were even so lucky, he'd find himself represented as a fractional sliver called "other".

But what self steers any of those neurons at all? Another blob of electric avenues and intersections pocketed away behind another pink wrinkled valley? Isn't that all we call me or you. It's all very confusing if you ask me.

My point is that the craft of creativity, whatever form it may disguise itself as, needs an engine behind it. If that engine is fueled by ego, fine. Even better, fuel it with a sense of duty, a sense of desperation backed by impermanence.

With all that in mind, time dwindling and a conscience raging, I'm turning to flash fiction to fill in the brief alone time I do have with creative expression. Some output, however small, every day. Every chapter no more than 1000 words (usually a lot less) relayed from the mind of a character existing in a particular setting; I write from the inside of the mindscape of Sage Ritskan School.

Excerpt from "The Harvard Psychedelic Club"

Pretty good excerpt from The Harvard Psychedelic Club from Reddit:
Weil and Winston had both read The Doors of Perception, Huxley's book about the insights the British writer gleaned from his 1953 mescaline trip. They walked into Leary's little office on Divinity Avenue eager to fly off on their own mystical journey. They were a bit nervous when they sat down, but Leary soon put them at ease with his soft-spoken charm.
The Harvard Psychedelic Club, magic mushroom research, excerpt, drugs"Yes," Leary said, "Huxley was the trailblazer. You know, I didn't have a clue as to the potential of this research until I had my own experience with psilocybin mushrooms over the summer. At its core, you have to understand that this is not an intellectual exercise. It is experiential. It is, and I'm almost embarrassed to say it, religious. But it is more than religious. It is exhilarating. It shows us that the human brain possesses infinite potentialities. It can operate in space-time dimensions that we never dreamed even existed. I feel like I've awakened from a long ontological sleep."
Weil and Winston were on the edge of their seats.
"Anyway," Leary continued, "the research is pretty straightforward. Our subjects take a controlled dose of synthesized psilocybin. We make sure they are in a safe and comfortable setting. We're trying to get people from all walks of life, not just graduate students. We're giving this stuff to priests and prisoners and everyone in between. They do a session about once a month and are expected to write up a two- to three-page report describing the experience. Between sessions, we get together and discuss whatever insights we've gleaned from all this. Now, I assume neither of you have had any experience with these substances."
"No, sir, we have not," Weil replied. "But we are ready, willing, and able."
On his second trip, he did have a more powerful emotional experience. Not hallucinations, but a kind of spiritual transcendence. It was a kind of serene feeling of connection with something higher. Everything just felt right — like he was seeing into the essence of things. But there was also something frightening about the experience. Andy was reluctant to just go with the flow. He didn't dare up the dose and go deeper. He could see that having any more of these insights might convince him that Harvard was a complete waste of time.

There are a few ways you can be a hero and support AJ. Free things are: try Audible or AmazonPrime for 30 days, link us to a social network like TwitterFacebook or Reddit, or download and rate the podcast in iTunesIf you have a little spare money you can send a Paypal donation to ajsnookauthor@gmail.com, buy one of AJ's Kindle eBooks, or buy anything on Amazon by going through the Amazon links on the site. Thanks so much for your support, AJ

Thursday, April 10, 2014

From '83 to Gnarled Fingers

Impermanence must be because of the play between time, cause, and condition, between the inseparable and symbiotic nature of parts and wholes. 

Like a guitarist, who in his old age acquires severe arthritis and is reborn a poet, pecking at computer keys with curled up digits -- a cross between ash twigs and maple sausage links forgotten since morning -- and the same knowing grin slapped onto his face, the one he donned during his finest solo in the coliseum back in '83. 

"Change is an illusion," he declares to no one in particular, or perhaps to everyone, particularly. 

The guitar can't play without the strings, fingers, frets and the space between bended wood and malleable mind. The poem, already there, can't reveal itself from behind the misty curtain without the help of those dead fingers and tired eyes, an old soul and a broken heart to one day massage those that are suffering back to zestful reality, to align with the memory of tomorrow.

Wednesday, April 9, 2014

Poetry of the Muslim World



http://www.amazon.com/s/?_encoding=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&field-keywords=islamic%20calligraphy&linkCode=ur2&sprefix=islamic%20calligra%2Caps%2C304&tag=thajsnbl-20&url=search-alias%3DstripbooksI'm teaching a "Muslim World" unit at the moment and have come across some beautiful poems. One of our goals in the unit is to step outside of our preconceived notions about Islam and its fundamental philosophy. The history shows that the religion was born out of military strength in Muhammad's taking of Mecca with 10,000 troops behind him. However, the history also shows an empire that was, considering the era, extremely tolerant of other religions, even giving special consideration to Christians and Jews living under the Empire's umbrella, referring to them in reverence as "people of the book".
Then, of course, there are the Sufis who, though they only make up a tiny sliver of the Muslim population, carry themselves in an austere and reflective way of life that inspires observers the world over. Speaking of Sufis, many of us are familiar of the work of Rumi, especially in today's world of info graphic and Internet memes, so I thought I'd skip Rumi this time and share the poetry of a few other greats. Let me know what you think. Can you see this poetry having the potential to cross cultures and open up dialogue between peoples of conflicting cultures? Comment below or via social networking to let me know.



Optimistic Man
as a child he never plucked the wings off flies
he didn't tie tin cans to cats' tails
or lock beetles in matchboxes
or stomp anthills
he grew up
and all those things were done to him
I was at his bedside when he died
he said read me a poem
about the sun and the sea
about nuclear reactors and satellites
about greatness of humanity
by Nazim Hikmet
The Strange Tale
We laughed at the past.
Tomorrow the future will be laughing
at us.
This is the world, a tale spun
by some great magician.
The living perform the marvelous play
as if they were already dead.
The stage is sad
with its curtain of mist.
And beyond the curtain,
the audience of the future watches us, laughing.
They don't see how the scripts
is falling into their own hands.
by Abu-L-Qasim al-Shabbi

There are a few ways you can be a hero and support AJ. Free things are: try Audible or AmazonPrime for 30 days, link us to a social network like TwitterFacebook or Reddit, or download and rate the podcast in iTunesIf you have a little spare money you can send a Paypal donation to ajsnookauthor@gmail.com, buy one of AJ's Kindle eBooks, or buy anything on Amazon by going through the Amazon links on the site. Thanks so much for your support, AJhttp://www.amazon.com/s/?_encoding=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=390957&field-keywords=islamic%20calligraphy&linkCode=ur2&tag=thajsnbl-20&url=search-alias%3Daps

Tuesday, April 8, 2014

Can You Hear the Reed Song?

Rumi, Upside-Down ZenAgain, another dose of cool, sweet reality from Upside-Down Zen:

The true meaning of "conversion" is not a sudden swerve in your life that utterly changes its direction forever, thank God, but a lifelong turning and attuning of your life to the glimpses through that door, the music from that room.
Rumi says: 
All day and night, music,a quiet, brightreed song. If itfades, we fade.
Tuning our lives to that most quiet and bright, most dark and passionately roaring ground note of our being, demands a very acute listening. A listening that can catch the reed song even in the midst of the most noisy, messy assaults of the ordinary world.

What I have trouble with is hearing that reed song while my baby's crying, the evening after a bad day at work, or in the midst of this flashy, always connected land of a thousand flat screens. I hear it in the mountains. I hear it while I meditate. I hear it while I exercise (and for a little while afterward).

I want to hear it in the anger of another man's voice. I want to hear it grumbling of an engine spewing thick and choking exhaust. I want to hear it in the ills of mankind and dance to its tune playfully and creatively for the rest of my days. It's a fine and attainable dream. What do you think? Can you hear the reed song?

There are a few ways you can be a hero and support AJ. Free things are: try Audible or AmazonPrime for 30 days, link us to a social network like TwitterFacebook or Reddit, or download and rate the podcast in iTunesIf you have a little spare money you can send a Paypal donation to ajsnookauthor@gmail.com, buy one of AJ's Kindle eBooks, or buy anything on Amazon by going through the Amazon links on the site. Thanks so much for your support, AJ

Monday, April 7, 2014

The Change in Him and That in Me

Mr. Scott at work was always negative. And I mean always. Rain or shine, morning or night, he served up turd sandwiches like Pete Sampras. "Nice shirt. Think you're cool now?" he would jab. Or, "Going home early?" in a loud enough voice for all in the office to hear, including the boss. Sometimes the words he said weren't offensive, just the tone was. "You're not watching Game of Thrones?" he would inquire with the identical tone and vitriol of a man confronting his unfaithful spouse. He followed with gas on the fire, a thudding and juvenile command, "You should!"
I began to steer clear of him, to avoid social gatherings because of him, to passive aggressively engage the people on both sides of him, and to never ever initiate conversation directly with him. Though, I one-day found myself drawn back to him, intrigued by the allure of beating him (whatever the hell that means, if such a thing were even possible). Terms like "a taste of his own medicine" and "serve him right" occasionally popped into my head when I was near him.

If truth be told, I imagined myself a guerrilla warrior protecting the sanctity of my homeland, in this case mine being the air around me devoid of his polluted ways. He enraged us all, often ensnaring us in his traps, its steel jaws of our own anger and stress invisible next to the prospect of making him feel worse than we did. It was a black hole of bad juju.

Then one day it all stopped. He started smiling more and complimenting others, me included. At first I wondered suspiciously if he wanted something from me, or if this was some new game or tactic like the angler fish's dangling forehead protrusion, an evolutionary design formed to enable a closer strike. 

I stayed leery for weeks, but his kindness persisted. He was dependable in his benevolence, a steel beam of good-nature. 

What happened next was more appalling to me than any of the blood boiling jabs that his apparent evil twin of yesteryear had doled out. What happened next was I found myself starting to become the old him, to fill the shoes that were infinitely more useful when left unfilled. I hated myself for doing it, but something compelled me.

I mocked his hair one day and his shoes the next. I turned down a lunch invitation, then an after work drink. Wanting in some sickly misplaced sense of revenge to see anger in his eyes, all I saw was melancholy, and like an airborne virus I instantly contracted it. 

But over drinks at a company party I learned a great deal about him, the places he'd been, the things he'd seen (much of it bleak and depressing), and I instantly knew how little I had learned up until then about perceiving the world and the souls populating it. Not until I know myself wholly and truly do I ever have the right to judge others. And then, I suspect, I will have lost the dastardly urge to.

So, what changed in Mr. Scott? What helped him turn the corner, to catalyze a metamorphosis of positivity? The answer wasn't given over drinks that night. Puzzle pieces started to reveal what led up to that catalytic moment, though, and they showed enough of the picture for me to understand. Enough to know not to ask any more. Enough to appreciate the missing question of why he changed. Enough to feel peace in simply letting the end result -- his change and mine -- run through me like a spiritual elixir, a soul-change in which there is no reversing.

Sunday, April 6, 2014

Jane Ladue: Goodie Two Shoes (Flash Fiction in the Sage Ritzkan Series)

"4:00 to 4:30 is snack time. I'm thinking PB and J today -- I know, sinful, but I gotta have it sometimes. Where does this urge come from?"

Jane Ladue continues. 

"From 4:30 it's study time, and that lasts till dinner." She takes a bite of her PB&J and ponders for a sec. "At dinner we talk about our days," she finishes with an unsatisfactory smile. 

Jane wants approval from her parents. It's what drives her.

"Would they be mad if I buy this fruit punch with the lunch money I didn't spend today?" she wonders. "For wanting it am I wasteful? Sinful?"

"Or, if I buy this fruit punch that they disapprove of, will it give me leverage somewhere else?" she also wonders. "Maybe they'll start giving out less money if I don't spend it all."

She's a budding accountant out to spend the last of the budget before the dawn of a new fiscal year.

And she's a typical teenager with an atypical mind, atypical because she's planning a murder in her head, a fictional fanticide, an imaginative ill. A lover of literature, and appreciative of the powers of the pen, however Jane's not sure if this theft of breath will take place on this plane or on that of the imagination.

It's these secrets in her head that her mom and pop would disapprove of the most.

"But they're mine," she thinks devilishly. "All mine."

What really sets her apart, though, and what should scare all of her classmates over at Sage Ritzkan, is that she can't decipher the difference between the two planes of reality -- the one she sees versus the one she imagines -- all that well.

What's upstairs tends to leak onto the page of reality like an old quill that was dipped glutinously deep into the reservoir. A wraith in the corner over there. A whisper from behind those curtains right here. Black. Always black.

And this is the secret fact she's hidden behind her studies and her discrete fashion sense from her parents for these past few yet oh so formative years.

"Who will die first?" she wonders, as if it's not up to her.

Meditation from the Perspective of Tom Robbins' Switters

An excerpt about meditation from the character Switters in Tom Robbins' Fierce Invalids Home from Hot Climates:


Switters; Fierce Invalids Home from Hot Climates; Tom Robbins; meditation; mindfulness
Tom Robbins / Meditation
They sat for nearly two hours, in the course of which Switters lost himself so that his essence passed into what some are wont to call, perhaps unrealistically, the Real Reality: that realm of consciousness beyond ego and ambition where mind becomes a silver minnow in a great electric lake of soul, and where the quarks and the gods pick up their mail on their way from nowhere to everywhere (or is it the other way around?).

What is the Real Reality to you? Is it nothingness or somethingness or something in between? Many times we assume that the ultimate reality, the godhead, the Intelligence, lies in some vast and distant place, but could it be nestled in the tiny building blocks of reality like the grains of flour and sugar nestled in loaves of bread?



There are a few ways you can be a hero and support AJ. Free things are: try Audible or AmazonPrime for 30 days, link us to a social network like TwitterFacebook or Reddit, or download and rate the podcast in iTunesIf you have a little spare money you can send a Paypal donation to ajsnookauthor@gmail.com, buy one of AJ's Kindle eBooks, or buy anything on Amazon by going through the Amazon links on the site. Thanks so much for your support, AJ

Friday, April 4, 2014

Anna Kamienska: "A Prayer That Will Be Answered"

I found this is Upside Down Zen and determined it to be grounding, even freeing, in its message.

Anna Kamienska, an obscure Polish poet about whom little is known, wrote "A Prayer That Will be Answered." It begins, "Lord let me suffer much / and then die." That is possibly the one prayer that will always be answered. She continues: "Let me walk through silence / and leave nothing behind not even fear"; and she ends by asking, "And let my poem stand clear as a windowpane / bumped by a bumblebee's head."

In every condition of the world's unfolding, we have only this moment now to be who we truly are. And part of who we truly are, very recognizably, is that insistent bumblebee -- bumping [our heads] against this strange glass we call the mind.



There are a few ways you can be a hero and support AJ. Free things are: try Audible or AmazonPrime for 30 days, link us to a social network like TwitterFacebook or Reddit, or download and rate the podcast in iTunesIf you have a little spare money you can send a Paypal donation to ajsnookauthor@gmail.com, buy one of AJ's Kindle eBooks, or buy anything on Amazon by going through the Amazon links on the site. Thanks so much for your support, AJ

Wednesday, April 2, 2014

Ralph Dog by Kris Lawrence: An Emerson Inspired Essay (Part 2)

The following is Part 2 of an essay by Kris Lawrence. He is a world traveler, philosopher, and producer of both writing and film. With a very fresh perspective on things, Kris is well-worth listening to. Currently, Kris is working on a blog and a podcast revolving around travel and philosophy. Get in touch with him here.

The Poet

   Using the notion of the Oversoul as his foundation, many of Emerson's essays act as  instruction manuals, prescriptions for how the movement of energy expresses itself in the various functions of life.  Or how it ought to, at least.  He wrote on Friendship, Experience, Self-Reliance, History, and many others, but to me, his most notable and concrete essay was The Poet.

   Emerson probably dedicated an essay to the concept of the writer because it was his own medium of choice and what his personal experience allowed him to know.  In The Poet, he asserts the poet, that 'namer of things,' sees the world from a widened perspective and simply uses the people and culture of their world as "secondaries and servants; as sitters or models in the studio of a painter, or as assistants who bring building materials to an architect."  To the poet, the rest of the world is a unified metaphor, a toolbox of symbols and images with which to construct the ethereal meaning that is seen in every "grain of sand."  A tree is not simply a tree, it is a presence evoked in certain conditions as a reflection of an intangible feeling that exists in a writer's mind.  Even as the writer, we may not fully understand why we included a gnarled, solitary Cottonwood by the side of a dry creek bed or a chair tipped over in the living room, but something deep in our mind does.  If the writing is genuine, an authentic expression of the feeling coursing through us, it will contain the mysterious traces of a higher will.
  
"…The poet is the Namer, or Language-maker…giving to every one its own name and not another's…The poets made all the words, and therefore language is the archives of history, and, if we must say it, a sort of tomb for the muses…Each word was at first a stroke of genius, and obtained currency, because for the moment it symbolized the world to the first speaker and to the hearer."
   
    I want to focus on the words "Each word was at first a stroke of genius."  Contained within that simple phrase is the crux of what Emerson is saying.  At one time, a word was more than an inert, static symbol.  It was a revelation unto itself.  Before the formal rules of language were established, the human bent to symbolic assignment must have been necessarily intuitive.  By that I mean that our early ancestors didn't have the left-brain, linear logic to gather and collectively decide that the best way to explain an animal was to call it an animal (or whatever their expression for it was).  Rather, it was a spontaneous movement arising through their mind, rather than from it.  A primal utterance expressed out of an unwavering connection to natural authenticity.  We couldn't quantify or measure the process even if we wanted to.  Hence the eternal mystery of genius.
    
    "The condition of true naming, on the poet's part, is his resigning himself to the divine aura which breathes through forms, and accompanying that…The poet knows that he speaks adequately, then, only when he speaks somewhat wildly, or, 'with the flower of the mind…' with the intellect released from all service, and suffered to take its direction from celestial life."
   
    The poet, especially in modern times, is seen as a luxury of a bygone era.  We are situated so deeply in the linear left brain paradigm that we have collectively agreed to forget about the immensity of the immeasurable.  As a culture, we want nothing to do with that which cannot be reduced and recorded by our fetishized technology and swollen pride.  To be humbled is to be rendered irrelevant.  We still believe that we will eventually create a lasting image of ourselves, or that we already have; that the movement of nature has achieved its pinnacle and the energy frozen in our material mausoleums is the final resting place of evolution.  The poet is the recorder of the now, the dutiful transcriber of what our world has become regardless of the archaic notions that still linger in the deep catacombs of our minds.  The poet and the mythologist alike understand that our symbols are dead, and that to truly move forward will require a new found ability to submit to life as it is, right now.  
   
   "Here is the difference betwixt the poet and the mystic, that the last nails a symbol to one sense, which was a true sense for a moment, but soon becomes old and false.  For all symbols are fluxional; all language is vehicular and transitive, and is good, as ferries and horses are, for conveyance, not as farms and houses are, for homestead.  Mysticism consists in the mistake of an accidental and individual symbol for an universal one."
   
Language is transitory, just like the rest of life.  Even from the time of Emerson's writing, a mere 170 years ago, the American dialect has changed radically.  While this fact becomes obvious at a simple scan through a 19th century book, what remains hidden is the extent to which we place a sense of permanent reality in our linguistic constructs.  We believe in our words, and we believe in the world they create in our minds.  We have lost sight of language as a tool, an approximation of life, and as a result our own inner worlds, our very identities, are manipulated by the language-makers of the culture.
   
    For example, let's look at the word "freedom," one of the US government's favorite catchphrases.  We are told that we are free, that our wars are an extension of that freedom to the oppressed, that in this country we have the freedom to make something of ourselves, the freedom to speak as we wish, the freedom to change.  The word, by its very nature, evokes positive feelings.  What could be more valuable to a human being than freedom?  However, if we stop to analyze the reality of freedom today, we are left with the wispy fragments of a dream long dead.

   From Rogets:  Free-dom n. 1. the power or right to act, speak, or think as one wants without hindrance or restraint. 2. absence of subjection to foreign domination or despotic government. 3. the state of not being imprisoned or enslaved.  
   As the power structures of the planet frantically try to patch the leaks the internet has put in the hull of their Titanic, we have seen the definition of 'freedom' changing radically.  No longer does a US citizen have the power or the right to act, speak or think without hindrance.  New laws have been put in place to restrict the ability to congregate and protest, one of our top ten (amendments) most important freedoms.  And I wonder how 'free' the people of the Middle-East feel from "subjection to foreign domination or despotic government" in the wake of ongoing wars?  Many other examples abound.

   The simple fact is that language has made us believe we are free when in reality we have simply lost sight of what that word, that symbol, actually represents.   

To believe your own thought, to believe that what is true for you in your private heart is true for all men,--that is genius.

Self Reliance   

In the final section of this article, I want to focus on Emerson's most popular essay, Self Reliance, because I think it provides a kind of antidote to the entropy of post-modern existence.  In the essay, Emerson berates the group-think of societies and bemoans the loss of our human birthright, the understanding that the answers we seek are contained within our own selves.  
  
    "Society everywhere is in conspiracy against the manhood of every one of its members.  Society is a joint-stock company, in which the members agree, for the better securing of his bread to each shareholder, to surrender the liberty and culture of the eater."
  
    In the words of the great Terence McKenna, "Culture is not your friend."  Culture--ours, China's, Brazil's, North Korea's--is a system, first and foremost, of convenience.  It is designed to expedite the process of living and bring efficiency and order to large groups of people.  In its unconscious construction, culture arose out of basic biological needs and the dictates of its stories are a reflection of realities we no longer face.  Take for example one of culture's most pervasive effects upon the human mind, the almighty need to fit in.  In prehistoric days, being exiled from the group was a death sentence.  A naked and weak ape, when alone, almost certainly perishes at the hands of natural forces.  A group of those same apes, armed with frontal cortexes and the ability to collaborate, however, thrives.  Fitting in, following the rules, and buying the newest Nike shoes all arise from this direct perception of the mortal danger lurking outside the firelight of society.  It's a knee jerk reaction, a facet of the modern self buried so far in the past as to be completely unconscious.  
  
    "The objection to conforming to usages that have become dead to you is, that it scatters your force.  It loses your time and blurs the impression of your character.  If you maintain a dead church, contribute to a dead Bible-society, vote with a great party either for the government or against it…under all these screens I have difficulty to detect the precise man you are."
   
    What Emerson is talking about is the problem that has faced humanity since the dawn of agriculture.  The problem of authority.

    Authority is the focal point from which human beings live their lives.  It's a fixation, both a cause and a result.  It's a habit of perception that once established, has proven nearly impossible to change.  It's nothing less and nothing more than the obscure power that we give our lives over to, the yearning for answers--and the satisfied burp we emit when they are provided.  What we've lost is the ability to discern true authority from false.  
  
    "Let us affront and reprimand the smooth mediocrity and squalid contentment of the times, and hurl in the face of custom, and trade, and office, the fact which is the upshot of all history, that there is a great responsible Thinker and Actor working wherever a man works; that a true man belongs to no other time or place, but is the center of things.  Where he is, there is nature."
   
    We have given over the authority owed to Nature to the systems of governance and religion we have been tricked into believing we love.  In reality, we don't love democracy, we love the autonomy it represents, just as we don't love communism but the spirit of community it attempts to engender.  We sigh with disgust at the state of the world, the corruption of our leaders, the inequalities in our systems of supposed sophistication and in the same breath secretly languish in the comfort they provide; the answers freely given that spare us the effort of looking for our own.  We allow the flow of life to be frozen in the glaciers of a machine that claims to have it all figured out.  And for this misplacement of authority, we suffer greatly.
  
    "Whoso would be a man must be a nonconformist.  He who would gather immortal palms must not be hindered by the name of goodness, but must explore if it be goodness.  Nothing is at last sacred but the integrity of your own mind.  Absolve you to yourself, and you shall have the suffrage of the world."

I hope in these days we have heard the last of conformity and consistency.  Let the words be gazetted and ridiculous henceforward…Let us never bow and apologize more.

   Be your own authority.  That's the message behind everything Ralph Waldo Emerson ever wrote.  He wasn't talking about the trifling ideas of a socially enculturated mind, either.  In seeking your own authority, Emerson meant to describe the process of turning inside to find the higher power that both brought you to this Earth and will soon take you away.  He meant the force that urges your heart to beat, that stimulates the bacteria in your stomach to digest, that fights off infections, and keeps your lungs rising and falling even when you sleep.  The simple force of life that keeps the whole show going against impossible odds.  That's the real authority and the one with all the answers.  

   "The inquiry leads us to that source, at once the essence of genius, of virtue, and of life, which we call Spontaneity or Instinct…In that deep force, the last fact behind which analysis cannot go, all things find their common origin."

   I wonder what Emerson would say of the world today?  How would he view the demigod of the internet, the muse of cable television, the assumed permanence of the nation-state?  Would he see any hope amidst our collective delusions?  I think so.

   Emerson was a chairman of simplicity, and I think that now, just as in the 19th century, the simple force of life works behind the scenes of our racing minds, patiently watching and waiting for us to remember, or to arrive.  

   Slowly, painfully, it seems that we are coming back to the knowledge that has existed all along:  That we are part of the picture, separate only in our minds.  One thought at a time, we are taking back our symbols and reviving our devotion to the only authority that will ever exist.  Thanks for the reminder, Ralph.

There are a few ways you can be a hero and support AJ. Free things are: try Audible or AmazonPrime for 30 days, link us to a social network like TwitterFacebook or Reddit, or download and rate the podcast in iTunesIf you have a little spare money you can send a Paypal donation to ajsnookauthor@gmail.com, buy one of AJ's Kindle eBooks, or buy anything on Amazon by going through the Amazon links on the site. Thanks so much for your support, AJ
back to top